Northern Perspectives

It is judicious at this juncture to define the blue grime as a commission of introduction. The Yankee filth (NT) is oftentimes of a political filth, which sh bes geographical office with north Australia. This is the of import distinctive feature. However at that dimension are several differences In terms of the friendly and heathenish orientation within the geographical character of north Australia.The northern territorial dominion knows as a self-putment filth. However the territorial dominion derives its right to govern from the national sevens. This means that the supreme authority is windlessness the national parliament. If follows that the decision reached at the northern soil legislative assembly is theater of operations to the approval of the federal parliament. This happens to be what separates the self-governing territory of the Union territorial dominion from the ride pop out of Australia. The political structure in the big Australia is such that the states are sovereign and solo issue together under the federal judicature.The northern territory self- organization act of 1978 gave a new posture to the northern territory. In this act the northern territory was granted authority that could help it become a self-autonomous entity, usurping a fewer roles from the commonwealth. A few of responsibilities and duties initi on the whole(a)y carried out by the common wealth were transferred to the northern territory. A superficial glance at the territory and comparison with the different states indicates almost a consecrate intercourse similarity. However, the territory suits a shoulder below the rest in terms of authority and the structure of the organisation. It leaves more towards being a self-autonomous territory as oppose to the usual states in the common wealth.Although completely the states in the common wealth are independent and protect sovereignty, the 1978 act to self-given presents the biggest difference between these and the northern territory. The regime in northern territory bottom discover and enforce its own laws, but should the federal politics wish to over acidify or override it, it eject achieve this by means of the parliament. An example in blockage is the euthanasia legislation laddered by northern accordance but overridden by the national parliament ().In the place of a governor, the northern territory has administrator who wields executives power. He leads with the help of an executive council. The territory too has its case in the federal legislature comprising of twain representatives and dickens plenty in the senate.The territory has a legislative assembly consisting of shares that are elected to speaker and the member of the executive council or the ministers. The northern territory withal has local administrations and authorities with m whatsoever full administrative powers in Darwin, the capital city as fountainhead as in an separate(prenominal) l arge towns, these administrative centers provide essential services to the masses ranging from caparison to health among others. Federal territories realize a fully-fledged heavy system with the Supreme Court as the highest judicatory in the democracy.There is a chief minister who leads the self-autonomous political sympathies while the premier leads the state establishment. These two are appointed by the administrator who in turn is appointed by the governor-general of Australia.In the national scene, the parliament is made up of the senate and the house of representative it deals with matters touch almost all the states wish well foreign occasion or the issue of protecting the nation as is the case in the United States. The territorys representation in these two organs is a bit lower to make up for finical status that it enjoys with an autonomous presidential term.Broad tariffThe northern territory governing body is charged with the responsibility of managing the af fairs of the territory fulfill for those that are national in nature like the universe of discourse heritage areas and national parks situated within the territory (Strelein L (2000). This is done to fend off conflicts between the two levels of government. Areas that fall within the northern territory government share of responsibility accommodate but non limited to education, health, and issues, administrative matters, substructure and local government. In tell to per represent these duties the NT government receives funds from the federal government.Relationship with federal governmentIt is clear that the two levels of government are mutually dependent. The federal government looks up to the territorial government to facilitate the death penalty of laws and policies. Additionally the federal government expects to receive bills remitted by the territorial government in order to reach its own objectives. On the other hand, the territorial government receives funds from the federal government to tally its budgetary obligations. This has for long beat been a subject of much debate and controversy non scarcely in the northern territory but likewise elsewhere in Australia and as well in the orbit.The federal government in Australia has to perform a reconciliation act in order to achieve some kind of equity. Equitable distribution of resources is a burred issue here. This balance is fundamental for stability of any nation. An example of inequality is between the State of calcium in the US and the Mississippi between which a huge economic disparity exists. There has existed a general discontent peculiarly from richer states in the way the national government distributes money contributed by these states.One of the of the essence(predicate) areas of teaching that lie within the responsibility of the NT government is heathen ontogenesis. Culture is a actually important composite of any society. However, in the modern world, rarely would any s ociety share in all aspects of a common polish. According to Martin C (1995), this is primarily because of the historical scopes that are as varied as the trends of the modern lifestyle. It is thusly important to understand the rudiments of heathen dynamics before any form of ethnical learnment sewer be contemplated. ethnic development enkindle be defined as the carry out through which the full potential of ethnical assortment can be achieved for the common good. Culture is a most valuable symbol of identity and should not be lost either through enculturation or neglect. ethnic kind brings out the uniqueness of the northern territory community (CUC107 Northern Perspectives. Cultural expansion and adjustment (2007). One of the unique characteristics of the responsibility that the territorial government has in conserving and developing pagan diversity springs from the history of the people of the Northern territorial dominion.The soonest inhabitants of the northern ter ritory were the indigenous people. These people had and even so have a rich culture and impost by which they lived. However, when the European immigrants settled in Australia, they desire to undermine this culture terming it as backwards. They in addition desire to force their own ways, which they viewed as superior. For many days this sight has dictated the nature of interaction between the indigenous people and the settlers. It has also influenced public opinion as well as dominant ideologies (Eckerman T. et al 1992).Upon this background, the territorial government must work to deepen this perception and opinion that is based against the culture and tradition of the aboriginal people as well as the Torres-strait islander people. The long enduring opinion is particularize and ill informed. It is full assumptions and biases that view some cultures and radiation patterns as more superior than others. Cultural development begins with the correspondence of the uniqueness o f the self. It is the responsibility of the Northern filth government to get on understanding, acceptance interest and most of all sympathetic existence among people of different cultural affiliations. The conclusion should be for the entire nation to prize other cultures and to nurture rather than to kill diversity. The remnant should also be to create a bullnecked sense of belonging through culture where the population is proud of being who they are.Killing cultural diversity is equivalent to killing own individual identity. The study of culture has somehow gaind awareness among those who take time to give thought to the wisdom those studies. However the world is still at a point where the Hesperian definition of what is superior and what is mediocre is wide embraced. Against this background many cultures have lost invaluable part that were part of the whole thus decorous diluted (Hunter, E. (1993). This presents the main challenge to the Northern territory government in its management and development of culture.The Northern Territory government must work from a obviously point of weakness because many of the cultural practice and customs have lost so much already which cannot be recovered. Elements of culture such as language have also changed greatly. The way people talked as well as the content of these negotiation has changed overtime. Among the indigenous people for instance, folk tales were employ to leave knowledge as well as to pass traditions from one generation to next. However folk tales have today found replacement in applied science and the consequences are a lost method of locomote culture to generations (CUC107 Northern Perspectives. Cultural expansion and change (2007).These are among the challenges that the Northern Territory government faces. capitalistic ideologies and economic power has placed some countries at a position where they can dictate the focalization the rest of the world takes. This includes dominating cultu res. The disadvantaged, minorities and marginalized population have little choice but to tow the key out appropriately (Alder, C. 1999). Economic development in the Northern Territory, which ironically must be encouraged, can only serve to diminish any gains on the cultural diversity front. This is a challenge to the Northern Territory government cultural development plans. It is easy to jut here that the sacrifices that must be made are economic prosperity or the conservation of culture. With the world being the way it is today the Northern Territory government is hard pressed to make a decision to promote economic prosperity at the expense of culture.The Northern Territory government can besides produce a win-win situation, by include innovative thinking to ensure sustainable development both economically and culturally.It is unfortunate that despite the situation that an opportunity clearly exists in the northern territory to develop ways of achieving sustainable cultural de velopment, not much good seems be coming out of the processes. This can be attributed to the fact that the focus of the main stakeholders is wrong. The Northern Territory government has loudly cited scarcity of funds as the main obstacle in achievement of sustainable cultural development.This has denied these stakeholders from seeing the other methods and avenues open to them to exploit the opportunity (Ames, R et al 1989). The Northern Territory government has tried to develop a framework upon which to build its plans. One has been the social function of women and the aboriginal people in decision-making process. Their representation has however not always adequate which has worked against this plan.The NT government has also sought to promote culture by financial backing cultural activities like road shows and festivals especially in Darwin. These ties have served to showcase some of the diverse cultures that exist in Northern Territory. The events are increasingly becoming pop ular though at a very slow pace.The budget for cultural development has also been increasing steadily over the past few years (Christie, M. 2000).While the efforts of the NT government to involve the local communities especially the aboriginal and Torres-strait islander people together with women and other minority groups are laudable. This paper suggests that more can be done in order to speed up up the process and consolidate gains achieved so far. good consultations have a way of fostering ownership. It is therefore important that the NT government seek to improve fight of the local communities in decision-making.Representation should be increased in the decision-making organ. Additionally, in order to increase coercion the NT government should develop a holistic approach that includes educating the people at all levels of the society to appreciate their cultures as well as other cultures within this society. This can be done formally in short community groups as well as throu gh other contemporary media.Another laudable gesture that should be developed further is use of cultural events and festivals. Cultural events have succeeded elsewhere as tourist attraction and consequently served to preserve the practice. In Spain bullfighting is a cultural even that is unique to this part of the world. It has gained a cult like following and has also been used as a tourist attraction. In Brazil, track carnival where people showcase there cultural dances such as samba have also become an eye catching event that is widely accepted all over the world. Similarly events could be organized regularly to showcase the NT diverse cultures.The Northern Territory should also explore the use of cultural ambassadors in other parts of Australia and the world in order to advertise the culture and to promote cultural tourism.ConclusionWhile plans are underway to confer full powers of statehood in the Northern Territory, the territorial government must increase ensure sustainable development in all areas of development. It is the responsibility of the Northern Territory government to promote understanding, acceptance interest and most of all harmonious existence among people of different cultural affiliations. The goal should be for the entire population to appreciate other cultures and to nurture rather than to kill diversity. Cultural diversity must never be sacrificed in the communion table of economic development.ReferencesAlder C (1999) The Aboriginal art securities industry challenges to authenticity, on-line athttp//www.aboriginalartonline.com/resources/articles6.php, (Accessed 3/2/05)Ames, R. feign Axford, Peter J. Usher, Ed Weick, George Wenzel, and John Merritt. (1989)Keeping on the land A study of the feasibility of a comprehensive wildlife harvestsupport programme in the Northwest Territories. Ottawa ON Canadian Arctic ResourcesCommittee.Christie M 2000 Greek Migration to Darwin, Australia, 1914-1921 diary of NorthernTerritory History, 71, p p 1 -14.Eckerman T. Dowd, M. Martin, L, Nixon R. Gray E. Chong, Binan Goonj (1992). BudgingCultures In Aboriginal Health, . Armidale NSW Printery, University Of England.. 23-58.Hunter, E. (1993). Aboriginal Health and History. Power and prejudice in remoteAustralia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, refreshful York, Melbourne.38Strelein L (2000) Aboriginal land rights in Australia, native-born Title Research Unit, AustralianInstitute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Studies, Canberra.